Difference between revisions of "Salinity sensors"

From Coastal Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Platinum Electrode Conductivity Meter)
(Electrodeless Conductivity meter)
Line 119: Line 119:
 
A potential difference is applied to the two probe electrodes in the Salinity Sensor. The resulting current is proportional to the conductivity of the solution. This current is converted into a voltage.
 
A potential difference is applied to the two probe electrodes in the Salinity Sensor. The resulting current is proportional to the conductivity of the solution. This current is converted into a voltage.
  
===Electrodeless Conductivity meter===
+
===Electrodeless Conductivity Sensor===
 
+
Electrodeless conductivity sensors use inductive coils. The inductive conductivity sensor consists of two high-grade toroids (coils) which are incorporated concentrically and adjacent to one another in a polymer or ceramic body. These coils form a current transformer. The sensor is designed so part of the liquid media forms a closed conductive current path passing through the toroids. The primary coil is activated with a sinusoidal alternating voltage, which induces an alternating voltage in the liquid loop (sample medium). In liquids which conduct electricity, this causes a current flow which is proportional to the conductivity of the sample medium. The liquid loop is also acting as the primary winding of the secondary coil which functions as a  current transformer. This current is rectified to the correct phase and amplified.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
===Refractometer===
 
===Refractometer===

Revision as of 13:10, 24 July 2012

Category:Stub
Category:Revision

The authors below are planning to work on this article

See also: Instruments and sensors to measure environmental parameters


Salinity measurements and definitions throughout history

Constant composition of seawater (Dittmar, 1884)
With more accurate techniques to measure salinity, there was a need to have the same definition of salinity and measuring methods across the scientific community. In 1889, Martin Knudsen was named by ICES to preside a commission to address the salinity issues.

Definition of Salinity, ICES, 1902 Since as far as Ancient Greece times, attempts have been made to try to measure the "saltiness" of seawater. However, the low sensitivity and poor repeatability of the analytic methods at the time, meant that measurements were not sufficiently precise to be comparable. During the Modern History more precise methodologies were developed: weighing after evaporation (Boyle,1693; Birch, 1965), solvent extraction (Lavoisier, 1772) and precipitation (Bergman, 1784). In 1865, Forchhammer introduced the term salinity and dedicated himself to measure individual components of seasalt rather than the total salinity. He found that the ratio of major salts in samples of seawater from various locations was constant. This constant ratio is known as Forchhammer's Principle, or the Principle of Constant Proportions. Towards the end of the nineteenth century, William Dittmar, following the work of Forchhammer, tested several methods to analyse the salinity and the chemical composition of seawater. The Dittmar methods for chemical analysis of the seawater were extremely precise. Dittmar analysed the chlorine content in seawater using silver nitrate precipitation of the chloride, and compared it with synthetically prepared seawater samples to vouch for the method's accuracy. He later analysed 77 samples from around the world, taken during the Challenger Expedition and noticed the same constancy of composition observed by Forchhammer: "although the concentration of the waters is very different, the percentage composition of the dissolved material is almost the same in all cases". [1]

ICES, 1902

WHAT IS PSU? by Frank J. Millero in Oceanography Magazine, 1993

After receiving the latest issue of Oceanography, I was irritated by the Sea-Bird advertisement on the inside cover. It shows a TS diagram that is labeled with the term PSU. Although I have been unsuccessful in getting the company to discontinue the use of this term, I thought I should write this letter to express my concerns about its use my oceanographers in published articles. The term apparently is used to denote the use of the Practical Salinity Scale and is an abbreviation for Practical Salinity Unit. As a member of the Joint Panel on Oceanographic Tables and Standards that was instrumental in the development of the international equation of the state of seawater and the practical salinity scale, I am amazed that the practice that seems to have been adopted by oceanographers in using PSU. The practical salinity scale was defined as conductivity ratio with no units. A seawater sample with a conductivity ratio of 1.0 at 15ºC with a KCl solution containing a mass of 32.4356 g in a total mass of 1 kg of solution has a salinity of 35.000 (no units or ‰ are needed). The salinity and temperature dependence of this ratio for seawater weight evaporated or diluted with water led to the full definition of the practical salinity scale. This definition was adopted by all the National and International Oceanographic Organizations. It also was published in all the journal publishing oceanographic studies. Somewhere along the line oceanographers started to use the term PSU (practical salinity unit) to indicate that the practical salinity scale was used to determine conductivity salinity. This apparently resulted from the previous use ‰ to represent parts per thousand, which some oceanographers felt was a unit. The bottom line is that salinity has always been a ratio and does not have physical units. The use of the term PSU should not be permitted in the field and certainly not used in published papers. Whenever the practical salinity scale is used to determine salinity this should be stated somewhere in the paper. The use of the term PSS can be used to indicate that the Practical Salinity Scale is used. One certainly does not have to use to term PSU on all figures showing TS data. I should also point out that UNESCO (1985)[2] has published a SUN report that carefully outlines the use of units in the field of oceanography. This report was also adopted by all the International Oceanographic Societies but is not generally used by the oceanographers and the journals publishing oceanographic data. If the field of oceanography is to become a recognized science, it must adopt the units that are basic to the fields of chemistry and physics. It also should not adopt new units for variables that are unitless.

"Salinity is the total amount of solid materials, in grams, dissolved in one kilogram of sea water when all the carbonate has been converted to oxide, the bromine and iodine replaced by chlorine and all organic matter completely oxidized [3] [4].

Although this definition is correct and served oceanographers for the next 65 years, the methodology is impractical and difficult to carryout with precision. Knowing that the seawater composition was constant and chlorine could be accurately measured by silver volumetric titration, the commission defined "chlorinity" as a measure of salinity. After analyzing several samples from nine locations, Knudsen and his colleagues developed an equation to calculate salinity based on chlorine content:

[math]S = 1.805\ Cl +0.03\quad [/math]


where chlorinity [math]Cl[/math] is defined as the mass of silver required to precipitate completely the halogens in 0.3285234kg of the sea-water sample:

[math]Cl = 328.5234\ Ag \quad[/math]


JPOTS - 1966

As seen from the formula above, this method has its limitations and is not entirely correct: when chlorinity is 0, salinity is 0.03. Furthermore, Carritt and Carpenter (1959) have estimated that the uncertainty of a computed value of salinity from a measured value of chlorinity using this relation can be as much as 0.04‰. This is due to variations in the chemical composition in some seawater samples (Baltic) and the fact that only 9 different locations were sampled to define chlorinity. In the beginning of the 60's, with the development of conductivity bridges, it became possible to measure salinity with great precision (± 0.003‰) . Bridges gave conductivity ratios between the sample and standard seawater used to calibrate the bridges. However the standard seawater had been developed for chlorinity measurements and not for conductivity, so a new conductivity standard was commissioned to the Joint Panel for Oceanographic Tables and Standards (JPOTS) and based on new measurements of salinity, temperature and conductivity from samples around the world, the standing formula of chlorinity was revised to:

[math]S = 1.80655\ Cl[/math]


Practical Salinity Scale-1978 / EOS-80

The relation between salinity and conductivity ratio was based on precise determinations of chlorinity and R15 on 135 natural seawater samples, all collected within 100 m of the surface, and including samples from all oceans and the Baltic, Black, Mediterranean, and Red Seas. After chlorinity was converted to salinity, using the formula shown previously, the following polynomial was computed by least squares:

[math] S = 0.0080-0.1692{R_T}^{\frac {1} {2}} + 25.3853 {R_T} + 14.0941 {R_T}^{\frac {3}{2}}- 7.0261{R_T} ^2 + 2.7081{R_T}^{\frac {5}{2}}+ \Delta S[/math]


[math] R_T = \frac {C (S, T, 0)} {C (KCl, T, 0)}[/math]


[math]\Delta S = \frac {(T - 15)} {(1 + 0.0162(T - 15))}+ 0.005 - 0.0056 {R_T}^{\frac{1}{2}} - 0.0066 {R_T} -[/math][math]- 0.0375 {R_T}^{\frac{3} {2}} + 0.636 {R_T}^{2} - 0.0144 {R_T}^{\frac{5} {2}}[/math]




[math] For 2 \le S \le 42 [/math]



where C (S, T, 0) is the conductivity of the sea-water sample at temperature T and standard atmospheric pressure, and C (KCl, T, 0) is the conductivity of the standard potassium chloride (KCl) solution at temperature T and standard atmospheric pressure. The standard KCl solution contains a mass of 32.4356 grams of KCl in a mass of 1 kg of solution, and the conductivity of this solution at 15°C and 1 atmosphere is exactly 35.

The present equation of seawater for seawater in use as the international standard for oceanography, is the 1980 International Equation of State of Seawater (EOS-80, released by the Joint Panel on Oceanographic Tables and Standards (JPOTS), and published by Millero et al. (1980). It is based on the temperature scale IPTS-68 and on the Practical Salinity Scale 1978, PSS-78 (Lewis and Perkin, 1981)

TEOS-10

Quite recently adopted by UNESCO's IOC and still under scrutiny by both sensor manufacturers and oceanographers, the new thermodynamic equation of state was based on the fact that seawater composition changes with depth. The motivation for an updated thermodynamic description of seawater is shown bellow as stated by Mcdougall et. al, 2009 [5].

  • Several of the polynomial expressions of the International Equation of State of Seawater (EOS-80) are not totally consistent with each other as they do not exactly obey the thermodynamic Maxwell cross-differentiation relations. The new approach eliminates this problem.
  • Since the late 1970s a more accurate thermodynamic description of pure water has appeared (IAPWS-95). Also more and rather accurate measurements of the properties of seawater (such as for (i) heat capacity, (ii) sound speed and (iii) the temperature of maximum density) have been made and can be incorporated into a new thermodynamic description of seawater.
  • The impact on seawater density of the variation of the composition of seawater in the different ocean basins has become better understood.
  • The increasing emphasis on the ocean as being an integral part of the global heat engine points to the need for accurate expressions for the enthalpy and internal energy of seawater so that heat fluxes can be more accurately determined in the ocean (enthalpy and internal energy were not available from EOS-80).
  • The temperature scale has been revised from ITS-68 to ITS-90 and the atomic weights of the elements have been revised (IUPAC, 2005).
In 1975, Brewer and Bradshaw suggested that changes in the composition of deep seawater can affect the conductivity-density relationship. This finding was followed by important papers discussing the limitations of the density-conductivity relationship that confirmed that samples from deep water had an elevated density due to the addition of Ca2+ and HCO3 from the dissolution of CaCO3(s), silicic acid (Si(OH)4) from the dissolution of SiO2(s), CO2, NO3, and PO43– from the oxidation of plant material (as predicted by Brewer and Bradshaw, 1975).


There are many important advantages and improvements incorporated into TEOS-10. This standard

  1. provides a complete thermodynamically consistent representation of all thermodynamic properties of seawater, and
  2. explicitly considers the chemical composition of seawater, and incorporates corrections for composition anomalies, which will also greatly improve our knowledge and understanding of ocean circulation, and the ways in which this is modelled,
  3. should lead to the opening of new research areas associated with the fundamental parameters of seawater, and
  4. will facilitate development of salinity measurement technologies with better long-term stability and SItraceability, required to investigate, e.g., climate change issues.

Sensors

Platinum Electrode Conductivity Meter

Electrode Conductivity principle

Salinity is a ratio and not a physical parameter that can be measured(under PSS-78, see box). Thus, “Salinity sensors” do not exist. What is commonly referred to as a salinity sensor is in fact a conductivity sensor.

The Conductivity Sensor measures the ability of a solution to conduct an electric current between two electrodes. In solution, the current flows by ion transport; therefore, an increasing concentration of ions in the solution will result in higher conductivity values. Conductance is defined as the reciprocal of resistance. When resistance is measured in ohms, conductance is measured using the SI unit, siemens (formerly known as a mho). Since the siemens is a very large unit, aqueous samples are commonly measured in microsiemens, or µS. Conductivity, C, is found using the following formula:

A conductivity cell. Current flows through the seawater between platinum electrodes in a cylinder of borosilicate glass 191 mm long with an inside diameter between the electrodes of 4 mm. The electric field lines (solid lines) are confined to the interior of the cell in this design making the measured conductivity (and instrument calibration) independent of objects near the cell. From Sea-Bird Electronics


[math]C=G\cdot kc [/math]
where
[math]G[/math] is the conductance, and kc is the cell constant. The cell constant is determined for a probe using the following formula:
[math]kc = \frac{d}{A}[/math]
where [math] d [/math] is the distance between the two electrodes, and [math]A[/math] is the area of the electrode surface. For example, the Conductivity Sensor has a cell constant, for instance:
[math]kc = \frac{d}{A} = \frac{1.0 cm}{0.1 cm^2} = 10 cm^{-1}[/math]
The conductivity value is found by multiplying conductance and the cell constant. A potential difference is applied to the two probe electrodes in the Salinity Sensor. The resulting current is proportional to the conductivity of the solution. This current is converted into a voltage.

Electrodeless Conductivity Sensor

Electrodeless conductivity sensors use inductive coils. The inductive conductivity sensor consists of two high-grade toroids (coils) which are incorporated concentrically and adjacent to one another in a polymer or ceramic body. These coils form a current transformer. The sensor is designed so part of the liquid media forms a closed conductive current path passing through the toroids. The primary coil is activated with a sinusoidal alternating voltage, which induces an alternating voltage in the liquid loop (sample medium). In liquids which conduct electricity, this causes a current flow which is proportional to the conductivity of the sample medium. The liquid loop is also acting as the primary winding of the secondary coil which functions as a current transformer. This current is rectified to the correct phase and amplified.

Refractometer

Calibration



See also

Historical overview of salinity measurements and definitions

References

  1. William J. Wallace (1974). The Development of the Chlorinity/Salinity Concept in Oceanography. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 239.
  2. UNESCO (1985) The international system of units (SI) in oceanography. UNESCO Technical Papers No.45, IAPSO Pub. Sci. No. 32, Paris, France.
  3. http://www.aslo.org/lo/toc/vol_14/issue_3/0437.pdf
  4. KNUDSEN, M. 1901. Hydrographical tables. G.E.C. Gad, Copenhagen, 63p
  5. McDougall, T.J., R. Feistel, F. J. Millero, D. R. Jackett, D. G. Wright, B. A. King, G. M. Marion, C. T. A. Chen and P. Spitzer, 2009: Calculation of the Thermophysical Properties of Seawater, Global Shipbased Repeat Hydrography Manual, IOCCP Report No. 14, ICPO Publication Series no. 134