Difference between revisions of "The ICZM Process - a Roadmap towards Coastal Sustainability - Realising the Vision"

From Coastal Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 28: Line 28:
  
 
'''Outputs''' as defined in the programme of implementation or its review.
 
'''Outputs''' as defined in the programme of implementation or its review.
 +
 +
== See Also==
 +
 +
* [[Integrating_Climate_Change_into_the_ICZM_planning_process_-_Realising_the_Vision|The Realising the Vision phase when Integrating Climate Change into the ICZM planning process]]
  
  
Line 34: Line 38:
 
Return to: [[ICZM_Process_diagram/Establishment|Establishment]]
 
Return to: [[ICZM_Process_diagram/Establishment|Establishment]]
 
</div>
 
</div>
 +
 
[[Category:The ICZM Process]]
 
[[Category:The ICZM Process]]
 +
[[Category:ICZM methodology (PEGASO)]]

Latest revision as of 11:00, 25 July 2020


Introduction  


Establishment  


Analysis and Futures  


Setting the Vision  


Designing the Future  


Realising the Vision  


 


ICZM Process diagram/EstablishmentICZM Process diagram/Analysis and FutureICZM Process diagram/Setting the visionICZM Process diagram/Designing the FutureICZM Process diagram/Realizing the VisionICZM pegaso 3 6.png
About this image

This is the critical stage in the Process where policy design shifts to the facilitation of change. ICZM strategies, plans or programmes for coastal areas will deploy a combination of policy instruments, management processes and actions. The strength of ICZM is its flexibility, adaptability to local circumstances, and operability across a range of sectors and issues, and with a representative governance structure.

Key tasks

  1. Implementation – implementing legal, economic and spatial instruments and management process.
  2. Actions – awareness raising, partnerships, financing and investment.
  3. Monitoring and Review - constant feedback into the review of the strategy, plan or programme and its action plan.

The implementation programme should have a clear work plan, be embedded into supporting funding programmes, achieving maximum “gearing” through multiple sponsors. The ICZM Steering Group and implementation team, or those bodies charged with delivery, should be in place and functional.

Outputs and their subsequent outcomes should now be visible and, where possible, monitored as part of the monitoring and review process. Raising and maintaining public awareness will be an ongoing activity.

Potential Outputs

A review on an agreed timescale. This may include proposal for a feedback to the process in the form of a revision, if deemed necessary.

The cross-sectoral management or steering group with Terms of Reference and clear lines of responsibility and reporting.

Outputs as defined in the programme of implementation or its review.

See Also


This article has been drafted by PAP/RAC
Please note that others may also have edited the contents of this article.

Return to: Establishment