Difference between revisions of "The PlanCoast project"
Cliviahaese (talk | contribs) |
Cliviahaese (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
===External Links=== | ===External Links=== | ||
*[http://www.plancoast.eu Project PlanCoast] | *[http://www.plancoast.eu Project PlanCoast] | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{author | ||
| + | |AuthorID=18353 | ||
| + | |AuthorFullName= Gee, Kira | ||
| + | |AuthorName=Gee, Kira}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Coastal management, Spatial Planning]] | ||
Revision as of 11:48, 20 November 2008
Contents
PlanCoast aim and structure
PlanCoast is an EU INTERREG IIIB CADSES project which aimed to encourage a practical debate on Integrated Maritime Spatial Planning (IMSP) amongst planners and provide hands-on tools for its implementation at various spatial scales. Led by the Mecklenburg–Vorpommern Ministry of Transport, Building and Regional Development (Germany), and running from 2006 to 2008, it brought together spatial planning and environmental departments and responsible regional authorities, from Albania, Bosnia–Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Germany, Italy, Montenegro, Poland, Romania, Slovenia and the Ukraine, with the specific aim of providing good practice examples and tools for effective integrated planning in coastal zones and marine areas. The project also sought to raise awareness of the potential benefits of IMSP amongst policy-makers and the planning community.
PlanCoast output
A central output of the project is the PlanCoast Handbook (Schultz-Zehden et al. 2008, download from [1] ), written for planners and other stakeholders involved in maritime planning, ICZM and other forms of marine management. The handbook outlines the purpose and benefits of IMSP and describes several steps that are necessary for implementing IMSP. The handbook is based on contributions from all PlanCoast partners and therefore reflects a wide range of experiences, settings and backgrounds. Although PlanCoast focused on the Baltic, Adriatic and Black Sea coast, the lessons learned can be applied in other contexts too.
This article summarises the main PlanCoast outcomes.
PlanCoast key messages
The PlanCoast partners drew up the following key messages for successfully implementing IMSP in practice:
1. Carry out a regular stocktake of coastal and marine uses and maintain an updated database of uses and their impacts.
2. Prepare integrated and constantly updated maps of marine spatial uses everywhere (ongoing spatial observation/monitoring).
3. Prepare integrated maritime spatial plans only where and when needed.
4. Make full use of participative planning by applying informal tools such as moderated meetings, working groups and media.
5. Draw up a national strategy for integrated offshore development which:
- is based on a guiding vision,
- considers land and sea,
- is coordinated cross-sectorally,
- is tied into international developments,
- may be further refined in regional strategies (allowing for a nested approach),
- is revisited and revised at regular intervals.
6. Help create the legal framework for IMSP by:
- identifying basic policies that rule coastal and offshore developments,
- operationalising existing laws and strategies through directives,
- preparing and adopting specific maritime legislation for offshore areas
7. Improve quality, comparability and accessibility of spatial data by implementing the EU INSPIRE Directive and agree on systematic information exchange by:
- Linking coastal and marine data collection
- Bringing together coastal and marine data collection and data management in one institution
- Formalising data flow: creating a regularly updated coastal and maritime cadastre.
Collect data according to need:
- For monitoring of trends and sea uses collect relevant data regularly and continuously
- For case specific planning in limited sea areas, collect data according to most acute spatial problems
8. The phases of Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) can be used to structure the IMSP process. Introduce Territorial Impact Assessment (TIA) as extension of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for projects.
9. Maritime Spatial Plans should be considered as a basis for all sectoral decisions. Make clear that IMSP is more than a technical exercise – it is a political responsibility. For this, political awareness-raising is necessary.
10. New institutions may not be needed …
- … but existing ones may need to be improved
- Clear responsibilities need to be assigned
- There should be one co-ordinating body.
Use different levels for different tasks:
- International level: agree common regulations
- National level: responsible for overall framework
- Regional level: cross-sectoral agencies to take the lead in implementation
- Local level: case specific solutions, acute conflict resolution, controlling
11. Improve the effectiveness of cross-border consultation for offshore development plans and projects. Use and strengthen transnational co-ordinating bodies, develop transnational concerted plans for offshore infrastructure corridors and integrate existing project results and recommendations into international policy.
References
See also
External Links
Please note that others may also have edited the contents of this article.
|
