Difference between revisions of "Biological Valuation"

From Coastal Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Biological valuation maps)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
===Biological valuation method===
 
===Biological valuation method===
  
The marine biological valuation methodology is able to integrate all available biological information on an area into one indicator of intrinsic value of marine biodiversity, without reference to anthropogenic use. This methodology can be used in every marine environment, independent of the amount and quality of the available biological data or the habitat type.  
+
The [[marine biological value|marine biological valuation]] methodology is able to integrate all available biological information on an area into one indicator of intrinsic value of marine biodiversity, without reference to [[anthropogenic]] use. This methodology can be used in every marine environment, independent of the amount and quality of the available biological data or the habitat type.  
  
For environments for which data are available, subzones within a study area are scored against two biological valuation criteria: [[Rarity criterion in marine biological evaluation|rarity]] and [[Aggregation and marine biological value|aggregation]] or [[Fitness consequence criterion in marine biological valuation|fitness consequences]].<ref name="ma">[http://www.marbef.org/documents/glossybook/MarBEFbooklet.pdf Heip, C., Hummel, H., van Avesaath, P., Appeltans, W., Arvanitidis, C., Aspden, R., Austen, M., Boero, F., Bouma, TJ., Boxshall, G., Buchholz, F., Crowe, T., Delaney, A., Deprez, T., Emblow, C., Feral, JP., Gasol, JM., Gooday, A., Harder, J., Ianora, A., Kraberg, A., Mackenzie, B., Ojaveer, H., Paterson, D., Rumohr, H., Schiedek, D., Sokolowski, A., Somerfield, P., Sousa Pinto, I., Vincx, M., Węsławski, JM., Nash, R. (2009). Marine Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning. Printbase, Dublin, Ireland ISSN 2009-2539]</ref>
+
For environments for which data are available, subzones within a study area are [[Scoring system for marine evaluation|scored]] against two biological valuation criteria: [[Rarity criterion in marine biological evaluation|rarity]] and [[Aggregation and marine biological value|aggregation]] or [[Fitness consequence criterion in marine biological valuation|fitness consequences]].<ref name="ma">[http://www.marbef.org/documents/glossybook/MarBEFbooklet.pdf Heip, C., Hummel, H., van Avesaath, P., Appeltans, W., Arvanitidis, C., Aspden, R., Austen, M., Boero, F., Bouma, TJ., Boxshall, G., Buchholz, F., Crowe, T., Delaney, A., Deprez, T., Emblow, C., Feral, JP., Gasol, JM., Gooday, A., Harder, J., Ianora, A., Kraberg, A., Mackenzie, B., Ojaveer, H., Paterson, D., Rumohr, H., Schiedek, D., Sokolowski, A., Somerfield, P., Sousa Pinto, I., Vincx, M., Węsławski, JM., Nash, R. (2009). Marine Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning. Printbase, Dublin, Ireland ISSN 2009-2539]</ref>
  
  
Line 14: Line 14:
  
 
[[Image:val1.jpg|thumb|centre|650px|Biological valuation of seabed communities in Polish Exclusive Economic Zone ]]
 
[[Image:val1.jpg|thumb|centre|650px|Biological valuation of seabed communities in Polish Exclusive Economic Zone ]]
 +
 +
 +
== See also ==
 +
 +
*[[Aggregation and marine biological value]]
 +
*[[Biodiversity as a marine valuation concept]]
 +
*[[Marine biological valuation - conclusions from a workshop|Conclusions from the MarBEF and Encora workshop on marine biological valuation]]
 +
*[[Potential application of the concept of marine biological valuation]]
 +
*[http://www.marbef.org/documents/Theme3/GhentWS/report.pdf Rapport of the MarBEF and Encora workshop on marine biological valuation]
 +
*[[Rarity criterion in marine biological evaluation]]
 +
*[[Resilience as a criterion in marine biological evaluation]]
 +
*[[Selected marine biological valuation criteria]]
 +
*[[The importance of geographical scale in marine biological evaluation]]
  
 
== References ==
 
== References ==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>

Revision as of 13:48, 8 September 2009

Biological valuation method

The marine biological valuation methodology is able to integrate all available biological information on an area into one indicator of intrinsic value of marine biodiversity, without reference to anthropogenic use. This methodology can be used in every marine environment, independent of the amount and quality of the available biological data or the habitat type.

For environments for which data are available, subzones within a study area are scored against two biological valuation criteria: rarity and aggregation or fitness consequences.[1]


Biological valuation maps

Biological value is not a direct measure of ecosystem health. Often, areas regarded as of high biological value are considered to be valuable providers of socio-economic goods and services and are of high quality in terms of environmental health. The main difference is, however, that biological valuation focuses on the features of species and communities themselves, and not on the contamination or the extractable/usable part of the ecosystem.

Therefore marine biological valuation provides a comprehensive concept for assessing the intrinsic value of the subzones within a study area. It is a tool for calling attention to subzones that have particularly high ecological or biological significance. The biological valuation maps can also be used as baseline maps for future spacial planning in the marine environment. [1]


Biological valuation of seabed communities in Polish Exclusive Economic Zone


See also

References