File list

Jump to: navigation, search

This special page shows all uploaded files.

File list
 
First pagePrevious pageNext pageLast page
Date Name Thumbnail Size Description Versions
09:57, 15 September 2016 GiovanniFig3.jpg (file) 27 KB Figure 3. Beach cusp spacing as a function of swash excursion for measurements and numerical simulations. 1
09:56, 15 September 2016 GiovanniFig2.jpg (file) 40 KB Figure 2. Flow circulation over beach cusps. 1
09:37, 15 September 2016 GiovanniFig4.jpg (file) 23 KB Figure 4. Measured beach cusp spacing versus the spacing predicted assuming the presence of subharmonic (left panel) or synchronous (right panel) standing edge waves. 1
15:35, 14 September 2016 CocoFig4.jpg (file) 20 KB Figure 4: Measured beach cusp spacing versus the spacing predicted assuming the presence of subharmonic standing edge waves. 1
15:35, 14 September 2016 CocoFig3.jpg (file) 31 KB Figure 3: Beach cusp spacing as a function of swash excursion for measurements (field and laboratory) and numerical simulations. 1
15:34, 14 September 2016 Fig2.jpg (file) 40 KB Figure 2: Snapshots of flow circulation over beach cusps. 1
15:33, 14 September 2016 CocoFig1.jpg (file) 101 KB Figure 1: Beach cusps 1
15:27, 13 September 2016 LucianaTable1.jpg (file) 122 KB Table 1: Characteristics of geotextiles and geotextile-related products according to functions and test methods. 1
15:26, 13 September 2016 LucianaFig1.jpg (file) 124 KB Fig 1. Iterative design process for sand-filled geosystems 1
17:56, 18 August 2016 NienhuisFig3.jpg (file) 33 KB Figure 3: Three deltas with varying wave influence. 1
17:49, 18 August 2016 NienhuisFig2.jpg (file) 357 KB Figure 2: The Rio Grijalva in Mexico. 1
17:48, 18 August 2016 NienhuisFig1.jpg (file) 29 KB Figure 1: The ternary diagram of delta morphology. 1
22:44, 5 August 2016 PrandleFig14.jpg (file) 67 KB Figure 14. Tidal current amplitude, U, as a function of depth, D and tidal elevation amplitude, Z, based on bed friction coefficient, f= 0.0025. 1
22:43, 5 August 2016 PrandleFig13.jpg (file) 40 KB Figure 13. ‘Equilibrium’ values of sediment concentrations and fall velocities. 1
22:42, 5 August 2016 PrandleFig12.jpg (file) 123 KB Figure 12. Spring-neap variability in import vs export of sediments. 1
22:41, 5 August 2016 PrandleFig11.jpg (file) 41 KB Figure 11. Schematic of dynamical and sedimentary components integrated into the analytical emulator. 1
22:40, 5 August 2016 PrandleFig10.jpg (file) 49 KB Figure 10. Bathymetric Zone. 1
22:38, 5 August 2016 PrandleFig9.jpg (file) 30 KB Figure 9. Theoretical and observed estuarine lengths L as function of (Q, Z). 1
22:38, 5 August 2016 PrandleFig8.jpg (file) 25 KB Figure 8. Observed vs. theoretical estuarine depths at the mouth, D (m), as function of (Q, Z). 1
22:37, 5 August 2016 PrandleFig7.jpg (file) 16 KB Figure 7. Theoretical envelope : Depth at the mouth as a function of river flow. 1
22:36, 5 August 2016 PrandleFig6.jpg (file) 17 KB Estuarine length, L (km), as a function of (D, Z) , with f=0.0025. 1
22:36, 5 August 2016 PrandleFig5.jpg (file) 48 KB Figure 5. Observed SPM (suspended matter concentration) and current time-series in: (a) Dover Straits, (b) Mersey Estuary and (c) Holderness Coast. 1
22:35, 5 August 2016 PrandleFig4.jpg (file) 23 KB Figure 4. Model simulations of SPM over a spring-neap tidal cycle. 1
22:34, 5 August 2016 PrandleFig3.jpg (file) 75 KB Figure 3. Processes determining sediment erosion, transport and deposition. 1
22:33, 5 August 2016 PrandleFig2.jpg (file) 59 KB Figure 2. Estuaries of England and Wales. 1
22:32, 5 August 2016 PrandleFig1.jpg (file) 26 KB Figure 1: Schematic of major factors influencing estuarine bathymetry. 1
22:35, 4 August 2016 CamFig3.jpg (file) 140 KB Schematic view of the instantaneous velocity and acceleration variation for a bore over a wave period and in the direction of the waves. 1
22:23, 4 August 2016 CamFig2.jpg (file) 59 KB Bottom velocity profile in the direction of the wave propagation 1
22:22, 4 August 2016 CamFig1.jpg (file) 83 KB Profile of the time-dependent velocity (a) and bed shear stress (b) in the wave direction 1
07:57, 7 July 2016 WesternScheldt.jpg (file) 214 KB Western Scheldt and Scheldt estuary 2
16:25, 6 July 2016 Columbia.jpg (file) 241 KB Columbia River estuary 1
16:24, 6 July 2016 Charente.jpg (file) 249 KB Charente estuary 1
16:24, 6 July 2016 Mussulo.jpg (file) 86 KB Mussulo Lagoon 1
16:22, 6 July 2016 Gomso.jpg (file) 217 KB Gomso Bay 1
16:21, 6 July 2016 Wadden.jpg (file) 209 KB Western Wadden Sea 1
16:20, 6 July 2016 Yellow.jpg (file) 118 KB Yellow River delta 1
16:20, 6 July 2016 Ebro.jpg (file) 156 KB Ebro delta 1
16:18, 6 July 2016 Senegal.jpg (file) 47 KB Senegal River delta 1
16:18, 6 July 2016 Mahakam.jpg (file) 135 KB Mahakam River delta 1
16:17, 6 July 2016 Mekong.jpg (file) 233 KB Mekong delta 1
16:16, 6 July 2016 Willapa.jpg (file) 151 KB Willapa Bay 1
16:16, 6 July 2016 Dyfi.jpg (file) 238 KB Dyfi estuary 1
16:15, 6 July 2016 Zambezi.jpg (file) 120 KB Zambezi River delta 1
16:03, 6 July 2016 WorldMacroTidalZones.jpg (file) 71 KB World map of macrotidal coastal zones 1
16:02, 6 July 2016 WorldCoastalPlains.jpeg (file) 73 KB World map of coastal plains 1
16:02, 6 July 2016 EstuaryLocation.jpeg (file) 88 KB Location of estuaries discussed in the text on the world map 1
16:00, 6 July 2016 Curonian.jpeg (file) 111 KB Curonian Lagoon 1
15:59, 6 July 2016 Hooghly.jpeg (file) 113 KB Hooghly estuary 1
10:21, 24 May 2016 DyeExperiment3.jpg (file) 137 KB Dye experiment 3. Panel a: Location viewed by the camera. Panels b, c, d, e: dye patch at different tidal phases. 2
10:20, 24 May 2016 DyeExperiment2.jpg (file) 145 KB Dye experiment 2. Panel a: Location viewed by the camera. Panels b, c, d: dye patch at different tidal phases. 2
First pagePrevious pageNext pageLast page